A SKID ROW COP’S OPINION

THE BIG TO DO ABOUT JAYWALKING TICKETS

Hello everyone.  Senior Lead Officer Joseph here.  One of my many responsibilities is to educate the public about the realities of Skid Row, and the reasons for our focused enforcement in the area.  After meeting with many people from near and far, many of them come away with a new, informed view of skid row as opposed to the many misconceptions they read about or hear from certain groups.  Yet there are a few people with whom I have spoken with, who witness all of the positive changes happening in skid row before their very eyes, but cannot grasp the concept of enforcing laws for  so called “innocuous” offenses in the Skid Row area.

When any law enforcement agency focuses its enforcement in a specific location, it is mainly due to the level of blatant lawlessness associated with particular area that has gone far beyond the norm.  In Skid Row, many people were under the assumption that it was their “right” to break minor laws such as jaywalking, or standing in the middle of the street and so on because they were poor or homeless.  They along with many of our detractors truly believe that we should just look the other way.

The scarcity of police resources prior to the Safer Cities Initiative helped further this perception, as these minor violations went unchallenged for the most part, resulting in more heinous forms of lawlessness over the years.

When we focus our efforts in a particular location, we are not doing so to harass someone based on their social status, race, or gender but to break the cycle of lawless behavioral patterns and practices of that particular community for their safety and the safety of those around them.

Also, we are not writing jaywalking tickets, as an answer to ending or reducing homelessness, but to reduce the high volume of jaywalking violations in a targeted area where the specific violation or violations have become chronic.

As it relates to people with severe cases of mental illness, I personally believe in the “spirit of the law” style of enforcement rather than “letter of the law” enforcement, whereupon I encounter someone who may not have the wherewithal to understand these basic laws.

Yet in skid row, I find that most people whom I personally know (and that’s a lot of people) with various forms, and degrees of mental illness clearly understand the law. As I drive my patrol vehicle down the block, violators are beginning to step back onto the sidewalk, instead of blatantly crossing the street illegally.  Just four years ago I would have driven through a gauntlet of humanity standing in the street just to respond to an emergency call in Skid Row.

Hypathetically, If 19,000  tickets were written for jaywalking in skid row (referencing several articles printed about the Safer Cities Initiative, the latest from the Associated Press), then I can assure you that there were about 80,000 warnings given; unfortunately for us we do not document warnings.

One’s social status in life, does not give anyone a free pass to violate the law.  Routine law breakers in Skid Row had a 30 year run of doing pretty much what they wanted, which is in part what made it so dangerous in the first place.  The message we are trying to make clear to Skid Row and anywhere in Los Angeles where the overall level of lawlessness begins to erode the safety and civility of an area is that if you do not want a ticket, you must obey all laws like everyone else. 

As a result of our efforts, improvement is beginning to happen in Skid Row as fewer tickets are being written.  The basic concept of concentrated enforcement is to stay focused on a problem area until the problems stabilize, or stops, and we must continue our work until it becomes a true place of rehabilitation, safety and order for all who choose to live, work or visit there.  As it stands now, for me at least, all it takes is a stern warning and high visibility to deter most illegal activity on Skid Row.   

Though I am in full support of enforcing the laws of our state for the purpose of educating the public and increasing safety, I am equally in support of providing alternatives for people in Skid Row who may not have the means to pay the fines associated with receiving tickets.

Over the past few months the City Attorney’s office has been engaged in an effort which I am in favor of called the Homeless Alternative to Life on the Street also known as the “HALO” program.  This program is mainly for low-income and homeless members of the skid row community, who receive tickets for minor violations.  The program gives them a chance to work a few hours of community service, or check into a drug or alcohol program that suits their specific need, instead of paying the ticket, or missing court and having the ticket turn into a warrant. In the end, the benefactors of our enforcement and outreach is the Skid Row community, as we have fewer incidents of skid row residents being struck or nearly struck by vehicles, as well as a new sense of order that continues to improve daily.

I will keep you all posted on when the next HALO program will be in the Skid Row Area.

From Senior Lead Officer Deon Joseph
32511@lapd.lacity.org

Comments

[John Hamilton Scott]

I am a deputy public defender, and I agree substantially with your comments about the necessity of enforcing even minor laws, especially when disobedience becomes rampant, which is in accord with Chief Bratton's "broken windows" thesis.

I am therefore perplexed why Los Angeles Police Department officers continue to get a free pass when they park illegally, in no parking zones and bus zones, near the Foltz Criminal Justice Center. As you very correctly say, "One’s social status in life, does not give anyone a free pass to violate the law." I think that applies just as much to police officers as to the residents of skid row.

Why should it be true that "if you do not want a ticket, you must obey all laws like everyone else," unless you are a Los Angeles Police Officer?

[Lucky]

that makes sense. next time you call the police because you are in fear for your safety, hopefully they will take their time to obey the speed limit, and find a legal parking space. this blatant abuse of authoirty (in your instance to appear in court by order of the court) must stop. these officers need to stop bending the rule to do such selfless acts as responding to calls for help as quickly as they can, or illegal parking when they see a violent crime occur in front of them. yeah you are so right.

[Curtis Lemanski]

I agree with Mr. Scott to a degree. If a police officer expects to be at court for a long period of time and is not in a status to handle calls, he or she should park in one of the lots designated for parking. If the officer is there temporarily, I think it is OK to park in red zones. I wouldn't want the officer to have to run six blocks in order to get their police car if a terrorist attack, Columbine-style or similar incident were to occur.

I'm glad there is a deputy public defender on the job who understands police use the enforcement of minor laws to bring peace and tranquility to areas where "disobedience" has grown rampant.

Similary, I am sure he understands the police enforce minor laws in violence plagued, gang infested neighborhoods in order to keep people safe. I am also sure he is quick to defend the police when community activists criticize about "over-policing" and levy racial profile allegations. Thank you Mr. Scott!

[John Hamilton Scott]

I certainly agree that police officers should not be required to worry about where they are parking (or how fast they are driving) in an emergency situation. In fact, that is what the law provides. I do not agree, however, that having to walk a couple of extra blocks to the courthouse, just like every other citizen must do, constitutes an emergency. That is against the law. No more so should a police officer be permitted to exceed the speed limit in the absence of an emergency.

An ordinary citizen who had to appear in court and decided to park in a bus loading zone rather than find a legal parking space would be faced with a fine of $1,000. Pardon me if I do not find a police officer's parking in the same place for the same reason to be a selfless act which should get a free pass.

[gottogoparkedinthered]

Oh dear Mr. Scott. I am sure you never commit a traffic violation enroute to your prestigious job at the Foltz Criminal Justice Center. You drive no more than 65mph on the freeway and 35 mph on the side streets around the court correct? And you wait until all pedestrians are safely on the sidewalk before you negotiate your left or right turn in beautiful downton L.A.! And if you get pulled over, you never pull out your I.D. card from the court and tell the officer, "Don't you know who I am? Why, I am a public defender at 210 Temple Officer!" Paaalllleeaaaaaaaaase Mr. Scott. Don't make me laugh!!!

[Concerned Citizen]

Mr. Scott,

You amuse me. An officer parking in the red zone can not be compared to the public safety issues that are being dealt with here. Jaywalking and other pedestrian traffic infractions are the leading cause to traffic collision along with DUI. I think that public safety should be more on your mind than the Cindy Brady tattle tale that you're clearly portraying yourself as.

You sir is what is wrong with this city. You rather deflect the problem of the inherent dangers the homeless face and blame those that are trying to come up with the solution. SHAME ON YOU! I rather that the officer have immediate access to their vehicle and equipment than have to park 20 blocks away because a leftist like you has an issue with their parking habits! Yes they should abide by the same laws as the rest of us but keep in perspective that they have public safety to deal with unlike you that sit in a cozy building.

God help us if there is a terrorist emergency in downtown LA and those same officers have to run blocks to get to their vehicle. I hope that never occurs but if it does you will again be the one that complains that the LAPD didn't respond in a timely manner. Darned if they do darned if they don't is what it's all about isn't it?

[HQ Dog]

Los Angeles is one of the few if only the only major city in the US, that fails to provide adequate parking for officers attending court.

If officers didn't have to spend so much time in court waiting for public defenders who always seem arrive late, only to ask the judge for a continuance, this wouldn't be an issue.